Search Again:

Re: Problem with worldnet.att.net

From: Tom Weishaar
Date: Sunday, July 13, 1997
Time: 7:54:00 pm

>
> > >Domain lookup for 'worldnet.att.net' failed because there is no MX or A
> > >record for this name
> > >
> > >When I look worldnet.att.net up using DIG on the Men & Mice site, there
> > >_are_ MX records for this domain (obviously).
> >
> > I've been getting the same thing here... to places like onramp.com which
> > I know to be up and running.
>
> Maybe this is an EIMS problem. We're using EIMS v1.1.2; never noticed the
> problem with AIMS. I've asked about it on the Mailshare list and will report
> back if I learn anything.

Glenn Anderson, author of the freeware program EIMS, did respond to my query and
made it clear the problem is unlikely to be EIMS. Which leaves QDNS v1.1.2 as the
most likely culprit -- but I've received nothing from Men and Mice on this either
here on the list or directly.

Hey Men and Mice, is there any reason to think this problem is addressed in the
new beta version? And does it take care of the -120 subdirectory not found error
when getting secondaries?

> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 13:08:04 +1200
> From: Glenn Anderson <glenn@qualcomm.co.nz>
> Subject: Re: Problems with MX record caching in EIMS?
>
> >It appears either EIMS or QuickDNS is caching a temporary error and
> >assuming ATT is down for the count. We've also seen this happen with
> >other domains. Anyone else seen this kind of problem? Any chance the
> >problem is in EIMS? We never saw this with AIMS.
>
> The DNR code has not changed from AIMS to EIMS, and it does not do negative
> caching anyway.
>
> Glenn.
>

--
Tom Weishaar
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://SiteCentral.com/ Web Site Development Corporation



Messages In This Thread:



Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page