Search Again: Re: c name From: Salvatore Toribio Date: Friday, May 28, 1999 Time: 8:47:00 pm >>is there any compelling reason not to have multiple A records instead of >>Cname? > >No. > >>domain.com A xxx.xx.xx.001 >>www.domain.com A xxx.xx.xx.001 >> >>vs >> >>domain.com A xxx.xx.xx.001 >>www.domain.com Cname domain.com >> ............... >In answer to your last question, the multiple A record method will resolve >slightly faster than the CNAME record method. In this case. What do you must do with the reversal? Do you ought to have two PTR records like these? 1.xx.xx.xxx.in-addr.arpa. PTR domain.com. 1.xx.xx.xxx.in-addr.arpa. PTR www.domain.com. Salvatore

Messages In This Thread: c name by Aaron Lynch on May 27, 1999 at 10:18:00 am Re: c name by Men & Mice Support on May 27, 1999 at 11:47:00 pm Re: c name by Salvatore Toribio on May 28, 1999 at 8:47:00 pm Re: c name by Men & Mice Support on May 29, 1999 at 3:21:00 am