Search Again: Re: Lame Delegation From: Eric Bickford Date: Wednesday, June 2, 1999 Time: 2:19:00 am >Spam. A spammer was apparently trying to send scads of mail through your >server, which was trying to verify the sender's name with your name server. >The name server was running into a lame delegation and was thus unable to >give the mail server a good answer. That's my guess. I'm assuming I have the same problem? Lots of "Lame Delegation...". I also get "Dropping Bogus Reply from..."? Is there something I need to do? ______________________________________________________________________ Eric Bickford eric@macweb.com Web Broadcasting http://webfm.com/

Messages In This Thread: Lame Delegation by Tony on May 25, 1999 at 3:23:00 pm Re: Lame Delegation by Men & Mice Support on May 25, 1999 at 10:48:00 pm Re: Lame Delegation by Eric Bickford on Jun 2, 1999 at 2:19:00 am Re: Lame Delegation by Men & Mice Support on Jun 2, 1999 at 11:43:00 pm Re: Lame Delegation by Eric Bickford on Jun 3, 1999 at 12:05:00 am Re: Lame Delegation by Donovan Rittenbach on Jun 3, 1999 at 11:20:00 pm Re: Lame Delegation by Men & Mice Support on Jun 4, 1999 at 1:09:00 am Re: Lame Delegation by Joseph D''Andrea on Jun 4, 1999 at 12:56:00 pm Re: Lame Delegation by Donovan Rittenbach on Jun 5, 1999 at 7:48:00 pm Re: Lame Delegation by Men & Mice Support on Jun 5, 1999 at 8:21:00 pm Re: Lame Delegation by Donovan Rittenbach on Jun 5, 1999 at 8:27:00 pm Re: Lame Delegation by Donovan Rittenbach on Jun 5, 1999 at 8:47:00 pm Re: Lame Delegation by Men & Mice Support on Jun 9, 1999 at 5:58:00 am Re: Lame Delegation by Men & Mice Support on Jun 9, 1999 at 6:19:00 am Re: Lame Delegation by Eric Bickford on Nov 22, 1999 at 2:30:00 am Re: Lame Delegation by Men & Mice Support on Nov 22, 1999 at 11:22:00 am Re: Lame Delegation by Fabio Cristian Sestilli on Aug 30, 2001 at 6:54:08 am