Search Again:

Re: Multiple CNAMES... who cares?

From: Men & Mice Support
Date: Friday, July 30, 1999
Time: 8:21:00 am

>Well, what's worse, redundant A records or multiple CNAME's?
>
>For example, I have my secondary dns on the same machine as my secondary
>mailserver.
>
>Right now, I have it set up like so:
>
>mydomain.com. NS ns2.mydomain.com.
>ns2.mydomain.com. A 198.0.0.0
>
>mydomain.com. MX mail.mydomain.com
>mail.mydomain.com CNAME 198.0.0.0
>
>Should the mailserver record be an A or CNAME in this case?

Address, not alias.

BTW: Multiple CNAME records are not an error. It's just an error to use an
alias (name with CNAME record) in any other record (except another CNAME).
It's also an error for an alias to have subdomains.

There is no rule against redundant A records (multiple hostnames with
address records resolving to the same address).

The following is *not* an error:
ns2.mydomain.com. A 192.168.0.1
mail.mydomain.com. A 192.168.0.1

However, this is an error:
mail.mydomain.com. CNAME 192.168.0.1
(which is analogous to what you put above). A CNAME *must* resolve to
another hostname. I assume that was a simple transcription error on your
part.

Hope this helps.
____________________________________________________________________
Chris Buxton Men & Mice
cbuxton@menandmice.com http://www.menandmice.com



Messages In This Thread:



Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page