|
|
 |  |
Re: Multiple CNAMES... who cares?From: Men & Mice Support Date: Friday, July 30, 1999
Time: 10:56:00 pm>Men & Mice Support said:
>
>>>oops, you're right! Thanks, Chris, for clarifying all the points (er,
>>>PTRs). I meant to say:
>>>
>>>> >Right now, I have it set up like so:
>>>> >
>>>> >mydomain.com. NS ns2.mydomain.com.
>>>> >ns2.mydomain.com. A 198.0.0.0
>>>> >
>>>> >mydomain.com. MX mail.mydomain.com
>>>> >mail.mydomain.com CNAME ns2.mydomain.com
>>>
>>>But I realize that this would be wrong.
>>>
>>>However, using the above scenario, does it matter if my secondary DNS
>>>("ns2") doesn't have a PTR record (I have to reserve the PTR for the
>>>mailserver record)?
>>
>>PTR records are almost totally irrelevant for a server.
>
>Are you sure about this?
Pretty much. I haven't seen any other service besides mail that needs a PTR
record for itself.
The only reason a mail server needs a PTR record is for when it acts as a
peer. In peer-to-peer interactions, I can see it. But I don't know of any
client software that checks the reverse record for a server.
>>The only service for which PTR records are currently used is mail, for
>>anti-spam measures. Therefore, it is important to have a PTR record that
>>matches the name of your mailhost (as specified in your MX record).
>
>I number of IRC and ftp servers, (especially on the University level)
>require that they be able to check your reverse records to allow access.
Those are PTR records for the clients. I'm talking about a PTR record for
the server. The IRC and FTP servers you mentioned don't care what their own
PTR records say, just those of the clients that log in.
____________________________________________________________________
Chris Buxton Men & Mice
cbuxton@menandmice.com http://www.menandmice.com
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |