Search Again: Re: QNS''s future? From: Men & Mice Support Date: Sunday, October 10, 1999 Time: 10:02:00 am >OK. I think most of us would be perfectly happy with an OpenStep >native version :) How about a Carbon-native version? I'm not saying anything official here, but it seems more likely to me that our engineering guys will make the far easier port to Carbon. >Heck, I'd be perfectly happy with a port of the already existing >Unix version of DNS/BIND with a decent GUI on the front. And >Whatever-The-Future-AppleScript-Is-Gonna-Be support.... No need to >reinvent the wheel too much. That last sentence is on target. No reason to create a real GUI for BIND, no reason to add AppleScript hooks to BIND, etc. The existing code has the interface you're familiar with, and it has some pretty extensive AS hooks. All we have to do is make a few changes to make it Carbon-ready. (Again, none of this is official word - frankly, I don't know any more than anybody else on this list about our plans for the MacOS X version.) ____________________________________________________________________ Chris Buxton cbuxton@menandmice.com Men & Mice http://www.menandmice.com Makers of: QuickDNS Pro

Messages In This Thread: QNS''s future? by Rob Thiemann on Sep 27, 1999 at 5:04:00 am Re: QNS''s future? by Sigurdur Ragnarsson on Sep 28, 1999 at 8:28:00 am Re: QNS''s future? by Rob Thiemann on Sep 28, 1999 at 1:51:00 pm Re: QNS''s future? by Peter Lalor on Sep 29, 1999 at 10:28:00 am Re: QNS''s future? by Adam Dennis on Sep 30, 1999 at 2:48:00 am Re: QNS''s future? by Men & Mice Support on Oct 10, 1999 at 6:39:00 am Re: QNS''s future? by Rob Thiemann on Oct 10, 1999 at 6:59:00 am Re: QNS''s future? by Men & Mice Support on Oct 10, 1999 at 10:02:00 am