Search Again: Re: Capacity From: andrew kagan Date: Friday, November 5, 1999 Time: 5:29:00 pm I'd say the answer is yes: "the Performa 6220 really is the worst piece of hardware to roll out of Cupertino CA" but you don't have to run out and buy a new server....the zone transfer speed is not necessarily indicative of the overall query response time, and whether it's fast or slow, it really doesn't matter. If you know that the zone will not change very much, once you move the zone over to the server, set the TTLs higher than the defaults...this will allow the root servers, routers and other devices propagating the domain info to hold onto it longer and query the server less, if the query-response time was in fact an issue, which I doubt very much that it is. > > So, you're saything that the Performa 6220 really is the worst piece of > hardware to roll out of Cupertino CA? Looks like I've got to go dig up a > faster machine to run DNS on. > > > >

Messages In This Thread: Capacity by Steve Dannaway on Nov 5, 1999 at 3:30:00 pm Re: Capacity by Jerry Pasker-Systems Admin. on Nov 5, 1999 at 4:16:00 pm Re: Capacity by andrew kagan on Nov 5, 1999 at 4:23:00 pm Re: Capacity by Jerry Pasker-Systems Admin. on Nov 5, 1999 at 4:23:00 pm Re: Capacity by andrew kagan on Nov 5, 1999 at 4:37:00 pm Re: Capacity by andrew kagan on Nov 5, 1999 at 4:41:00 pm Re: Capacity by Jerry Pasker-Systems Admin. on Nov 5, 1999 at 4:58:00 pm Re: Capacity by andrew kagan on Nov 5, 1999 at 5:29:00 pm Re: Capacity by Jerry Pasker-Systems Admin. on Nov 5, 1999 at 10:09:00 pm Re: Capacity by Men & Mice Support on Nov 5, 1999 at 10:59:00 pm Re: Capacity by Warren Michelsen on Nov 6, 1999 at 12:05:00 am Re: Capacity by Jerry Pasker-Systems Admin. on Nov 6, 1999 at 12:45:00 am