Search Again:

Re: Missing A records and slow resolution

From: Aaron Lynch
Date: Monday, December 13, 1999
Time: 4:27:00 am

Personall, I've found cnames so problematic, that I just don't use them at
all.

AFAIK it's perfectly ok to use multiple A records for a host, so the way I
see it, if a client requests a host which is a cname then it has to also find
out about where the c name points. so in the best case, if everything works
perfectly, a cname doubles the load on the server. I just don't get why
you'd wanna do this : )

my suggestion is to make then all a records, unless somebody else might have
a compelling reason not to do this.

Mia's Virtual Post Office wrote:

> Hello, I have a new colo customer that has about 30 or so domains that he
> transferred here. We changed the NS records to reflect our Name Servers
> and the new InterNIC info, etc. The customer, as well as some of his
> customers are complaining of latency or difficulty in getting to their
> site/s.
>
> At first I thought this was a Web* VHosts problem, (though I think VH may
> still be causing some problems as it takes Web* on this machine about 5
> minutes to startup) but after looking at all the Zone files he emailed
> us, I noticed that most have no A Records.
>
> I also ran DNS Expert on some of the domains an it reported it couldn't
> find the authoritative DNS server for the domain.
>
> I think the problem may stem from the fact that there is no A record for
> most of these domains, just CNAMEs. Is there an RFC that stipulates the
> need for A records?
>
> Also, what else would cause this problem?
>
> jer
>
> "On a day no different than the one now dawning, Leonardo drew the first
> strokes of the Mona Lisa, Shakespeare wrote the first words of Hamlet, and
> Beethoven began work on his Ninth Symphony." And Windows98 Crashed!
>
> Hey, I bought my Apple Stock @ $18, WHO'S LAUGHING NOW!!!



Messages In This Thread:



Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page