|
|
 |  |
Re: load balancingFrom: Paul S Vail Date: Thursday, January 6, 2000
Time: 2:41:00 am>>Chris,
>>
>>Do you have any rough notes on load balancing. I know y'all are
>>rewriting that portion of the guide, but I need some idiot-proof
>>guidelines for setting up a qdns/w* set of servers for primary and
>>secondary hosting. My goal is to make our systems as redundant as
>>possible to avoid something that happened today: my primary ISP changed
>>all of their IP addresses, but forgot to notify me of the change until
>>after it happened. I've made the changes for my clients with the
>>appropriate registrars -- but for the next 48 hours or so until they take
>>effect, I'm screwed for serving.
>>
>>So, what I want is: use redundant name and http/mail servers, with the
>>fast servers on at the colo site and my wimpy machines here on a
>>dedicated dialup. I know that DNS isn't really designed to do what I
>>want, but perhaps by setting the load characteristics someone mentioned
>>to 9999 (primary) and 1 (pokie), I can achieve some possibility of having
>>a backup system to cover my ass when the primary goes down.
>
>No problem. Set your DNS like this:
> example.com. NS primary.example.com.
> example.com. NS pokie.example.com.
> example.com. MX 10 primary.example.com.
> example.com. MX 20 pokie.example.com.
> example.com. A <address of primary>
> primary.example.com. A <address of primary>
> pokie.example.com. A <address of pokie>
> www.example.com. Load Hosts: 2 (primary and pokie)
>
>You can also add records like this, if you like:
> mail.example.com. CNAME primary.example.com.
> ftp.example.com. CNAME primary.example.com.
>
>Or, for greater flexibility in your mail setup, you can use these:
> smtp.example.com. CNAME www.example.com.
> pop.example.com. CNAME primary.example.com.
>
>This way, even if primary goes down, users can still send mail. They
>won't be able to get their mail, though, until primary comes back up.
>
>Use "primary" as your primary DNS server, and "pokie" as your
>secondary DNS server. On pokie, make sure to put two entries in the
>Secondary Data window - one in the main panel for your domain, and
>one in the load balancing panel for your load balance record.
>
>Then, as you said above, use fixed load preferences on your WebSTAR
>servers - 9999 for primary and 1 for pokie. The dedicated dial-up
>line for pokie will likely get a fair amount of DNS traffic, but
>almost no other traffic, so long as both are functioning.
O.K., that would make sense for the primary name server. Here's where my
brain turns to mush: It seems from the above, the pokey machine's dns
needs to have pretty much exactly the same primary domain tables set up
as the "primary" machine, in addition to the secondary data filled out
properly? This is what I read from your reply, but want to make sure I
understand this properly before implimenting.
paul
|
Messages In This Thread:- Load Balancing by Kirk Samuelson on Aug 18, 1999 at 7:55:00 am
- Load balancing by Jona Tallieu (T & T n.v.) on Dec 11, 1999 at 3:18:00 pm
- Load Balancing by Suzanne Swift on Dec 20, 1999 at 12:19:00 pm
- Load balancing by Suzanne Swift on May 8, 2001 at 5:40:49 pm
- Load Balancing by Simon Forster on Jul 23, 2001 at 3:57:59 am
- Load balancing by Ross Markbreiter on Aug 7, 2001 at 6:26:54 pm
- Load Balancing by Ross Markbreiter on Aug 29, 2001 at 12:44:32 pm
- Load balancing by Ross Markbreiter on Oct 16, 2001 at 2:19:09 pm
- Load Balancing by rob on Jan 28, 2002 at 4:14:49 pm
- Load Balancing by rob on Jan 29, 2002 at 4:29:17 pm
- Load Balancing by Bob Minor on Nov 15, 2002 at 3:27:45 pm
- Load Balancing by Bob Minor on Nov 16, 2002 at 3:25:55 pm
- load balancing by Guy Jones on Jul 16, 2004 at 3:08:47 pm
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |