Search Again:

Re: Load Balancing and Subdomain Name

From: Aaron Lynch
Date: Wednesday, February 23, 2000
Time: 1:45:00 am

I sure hope you guys are rethinking your fault tolerance...

I need to be able to have queries go to a secondary server (NT or Unix) if
the primary is down.
Currently, all servers need to have Webstar V hosts, which I hate.

Also, Will a public Beta program be forthcoming? (I need this like
yesterday)

-A-

Men & Mice Support wrote:

> At 4:37 PM -0600 2/21/2000, Steve Dannaway wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Here's a quickie -- I hope. I've got a load balanced setup with one
> >load balanced record and all other fully qualified domains CNAMEd over
> >to it.
> >
> >Is there any way that is "legal" under the guises of DNS to load balance
> >these subdomains (or whatever an address without without a hostname is
> >called -- example.org as opposed to www.example.org)?
>
> There isn't any way to load balance example.org if you're also going
> to have a record for www.example.org (or an MX record for
> example.org, or pretty much anything else along those lines). This is
> because a load balance record is currently implemented as a delegated
> subdomain.
>
> This restriction will not be present in QuickDNS 3, for which we have
> redesigned the load balance mechanism a bit. Unfortunately, QuickDNS
> 3 is still several months away.
>
> You can, of course, use round-robin load sharing on a name like
> example.org. This gives no fault tolerance, though.
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Chris Buxton cbuxton@menandmice.com
> Men & Mice http://www.menandmice.com
> Makers of: QuickDNS Pro



Messages In This Thread:



Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page