Search Again: Re: PTR records From: Men & Mice Support Date: Monday, May 1, 2000 Time: 9:58:19 pm At 11:50 PM -0400 5/1/00, Daniel Berlinger wrote: >> though they won't look quite normal > >In what way? What will they look like? (Just trying to be thorough here.) Like I said, that's up to the upstream provider. The names might look like this: 129.128.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (for 192.168.0.129) or they might just as easily look like any of these: 129.fred.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa. 129.in-addr.fred.com. 1.in-addr.fred.com. (assuming fred.com is the end-user's domain). Read the RFC. It may take a few tries to sink in, but once it does, all will be clear. ____________________________________________________________________ Chris Buxton cbuxton@menandmice.com Men & Mice http://www.menandmice.com Makers of: QuickDNS Pro

Messages In This Thread: PTR records by Peter Bancroft on Sep 15, 1999 at 1:39:00 am Re: PTR records by Men & Mice Support on Sep 16, 1999 at 6:11:00 am PTR Records by Ron Holmes on Apr 5, 2000 at 1:55:29 am Re: PTR Records by Men & Mice Support on Apr 5, 2000 at 2:05:57 am PTR records by Daniel Berlinger on May 1, 2000 at 3:34:29 pm Re: PTR records by Men & Mice Support on May 1, 2000 at 7:12:42 pm Re: PTR records by Daniel Berlinger on May 1, 2000 at 8:50:05 pm Re: PTR records by Men & Mice Support on May 1, 2000 at 9:58:19 pm PTR records by Dave Cooper on Sep 14, 2001 at 1:19:04 pm Re: PTR records by Global Homes Webmaster on Sep 14, 2001 at 1:34:16 pm Re: PTR records by Global Homes Webmaster on Sep 17, 2001 at 11:48:19 am PTR records by Libby Millard on Jul 22, 2003 at 11:05:49 am Re: PTR records by Men & Mice Support on Jul 22, 2003 at 2:58:41 pm Re: PTR records by Libby Millard on Jul 24, 2003 at 9:36:46 am