Search Again: Re: name server aliases From: Aaron Lynch Date: Wednesday, September 6, 2000 Time: 6:31:50 pm Your honor: on 9/6/00 6:03 PM, Mia's Virtual Post Office at list@mia.net confessed: > Men & Mice Support said:! >> >> Actually, there's an important difference. CNAME chaining is >> recommended against, but it is permitted. Using an alias in an NS >> record simply will not work reliably. >> > > > As I have told the customer, but in this business, you really have to > bend over bass-ackwards to get the business. It is one of those, <me> > "well this really cannot work, and here is why", <him> "but, so and so > said they could do it." > Been there :) Unfortunately, the only 'answer' is bind. -- Aaron Lynch System Administrator NineWire Digital Solutions

Messages In This Thread: name server aliases by Mia''s Virtual Post Office on Sep 6, 2000 at 4:49:07 pm Re: name server aliases by Aaron Lynch on Sep 6, 2000 at 5:04:46 pm Re: name server aliases by Global Homes Webmaster on Sep 6, 2000 at 5:09:38 pm Re: name server aliases by Mia''s Virtual Post Office on Sep 6, 2000 at 5:18:30 pm Re: name server aliases by Men & Mice Support on Sep 6, 2000 at 5:22:30 pm Re: name server aliases by Global Homes Webmaster on Sep 6, 2000 at 5:29:25 pm Re: name server aliases by Men & Mice Support on Sep 6, 2000 at 5:39:17 pm Re: name server aliases by Global Homes Webmaster on Sep 6, 2000 at 5:46:28 pm Re: name server aliases by Aaron Lynch on Sep 6, 2000 at 5:57:26 pm Re: name server aliases by Mia''s Virtual Post Office on Sep 6, 2000 at 6:03:30 pm Re: name server aliases by Aaron Lynch on Sep 6, 2000 at 6:31:50 pm