Search Again: Re: Performance question on Mac IIci From: David M. Dantowitz Date: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 Time: 8:20:58 am Piero Giobbi at piero.giobbi@fb.se said this on 9/13/00 10:46 AM >I Think the 7600 is really great for QuickDNS. I have two and they work >great, never hangs or having problems.. Running 8.6 and latest quickDNS.. Right, no question, BUT, we have a 7500 which ran QuickDNS fine forever until we put in a G3 upgrade card. Makes our CGIs and WebSTAR scream, but QuickDNS was not happy. I think something with interrupts on the G3 card isn't implemented right. The G3 card makes The ZipBurst 2.0 CGI run about 15-20 times faster. I fear the same thing will happen with the 7600 when we add our G3 card (waiting for some VRAM to come in for it, so can't yet test it). So, rather than throw a good G3 upgrade card on the shelf, I'd rather use it with the 7600 and use another machine for a spare DNS box. (Sorry for all the list traffic!) David

Messages In This Thread: Performance question on Mac IIci by David M. Dantowitz on Sep 12, 2000 at 7:00:15 am Re: Performance question on Mac IIci by Mark S. Edwards on Sep 12, 2000 at 7:29:23 am Re: Performance question on Mac IIci by Dale on Sep 12, 2000 at 9:59:13 am Re: Performance question on Mac IIci by Men & Mice Support on Sep 12, 2000 at 10:06:56 am Re: Performance question on Mac IIci by Mark Lucas on Sep 13, 2000 at 7:03:29 am Re: Performance question on Mac IIci by David M. Dantowitz on Sep 13, 2000 at 7:21:15 am Re: Performance question on Mac IIci by Steffan A. Cline on Sep 13, 2000 at 7:29:14 am Re: Performance question on Mac IIci by Piero Giobbi on Sep 13, 2000 at 7:46:06 am Re: Performance question on Mac IIci by David M. Dantowitz on Sep 13, 2000 at 8:20:58 am Re: Performance question on Mac IIci by David Ross on Sep 14, 2000 at 2:21:02 am Re: Performance question on Mac IIci by David M. Dantowitz on Sep 14, 2000 at 4:37:24 am