Search Again: Re: Optigold v2.5.7 Questions From: Matthew Bailey Date: Monday, October 2, 2000 Time: 9:28:41 am What we did was send them to an ODBC data source and we have a process that picks entries off and deals with them in the order a machine can handle. On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Shawn Hogan wrote: > Charley Webb wrote: > > > I just upgraded to the latest Optigold and have a question about one of the > > new features, which is when you place a customer on hold, you can also set > > Optigold to place a customers additional Email account(s) on hold. > > > > The problem is that we run UNIX servers here, and lets say that john doe > > customer who has 5 Email accounts get's placed on hold. Optigold will make 5 > > telnet sessions to place this customers Email accounts on hold, but the > > problem us that it tries to place them on hold all at the same time, big > > boo-boo. UNIX password databases do not like the password file(s) to be > > modified all at the same time. Is there a way to have Optigold do it one > > Email at a time? > > Not really no. At least not yet. > > - Shawn > > ------------------------------- > Shawn D. Hogan > President, Digital Point Solutions > http://www.digitalpoint.com > (858) 452-3696 > > > ------------------------------------------ > To subscribe, unsubscribe and list archive > please visit http://www.optigold.com/lists > ------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe and list archive please visit http://www.optigold.com/lists ------------------------------------------

Messages In This Thread: Optigold v2.5.7 Questions by Charley Webb on Oct 2, 2000 at 8:10:43 am Re: Optigold v2.5.7 Questions by Shawn Hogan on Oct 2, 2000 at 8:33:47 am Re: Optigold v2.5.7 Questions by Charley Webb on Oct 2, 2000 at 8:39:35 am Re: Optigold v2.5.7 Questions by Matthew Bailey on Oct 2, 2000 at 9:28:41 am Re: Optigold v2.5.7 Questions by Technical Staff on Oct 2, 2000 at 3:01:27 pm