Search Again: Re: QDNS 3.0 From: marklist Date: Thursday, December 7, 2000 Time: 10:37:10 am Thru the beta period, I did exactly the opposite. Ran 3.0 on my secondaries, and 2.x on my primaries. Didn=B9t have any issues at all including zone transfers. Mark On 12/7/00 1:11 PM, "Global Homes Webmaster" <webmaster@globalhomes.com> wrote: > On 12/07/00 at 16:16, Paul Willis wrote: >=20 >> Does version QDNS do zone transfers in some 'standard' way? >>=20 >> ie: Will I be able to run secondary on 68k version 2.x and primary on >> PowerPC version 3.0 (or visa versa)? >=20 > Well, the 'standard' way of doing zone transfers is what's defined by the > RFCs. I would expect that all versions of QDNS follow the RFCs, so it > shouldn't be an issue. In fact, you should be able to (and can) use QDNS = in > either a primary or secondary role and pair it with some other name serve= r > entirely (BIND, etc.) in the opposite role. >=20 > Christopher Bort

Messages In This Thread: QDNS 3.0 by Paul Didzerekis on Dec 6, 2000 at 4:51:05 pm Re: QDNS 3.0 by Men & Mice Support on Dec 6, 2000 at 6:05:53 pm Re: QDNS 3.0 by Paul Willis on Dec 7, 2000 at 8:18:08 am Re: QDNS 3.0 by Albert Rodriguez on Dec 7, 2000 at 8:56:41 am Re: QDNS 3.0 by Global Homes Webmaster on Dec 7, 2000 at 10:11:54 am Re: QDNS 3.0 by marklist on Dec 7, 2000 at 10:37:10 am Re: QDNS 3.0 by Men & Mice Support on Dec 7, 2000 at 3:51:53 pm