|
|
 |  |
QuickDNS logsFrom: ahclist Date: Thursday, April 12, 2001
Time: 7:11:51 amChris & Co,
Hey, I've a strange request here. I have a couple of our servers
colo'ed, running QuickDNS 2.2.1 and Webstar 4.2 on these beasties.
Our traffic is far higher than I would have expected from the logs we
can monitor effectively (http, mail and a horribly inaccurate ftp log
from webstar's plugin). Assuming the data from these combined logs
is within 20% of the actual traffic, I still cannot account for
nearly 80% of our traffic loads to the servers. The traffic is
measured from the router logs at the colo -- which unfortunately
cannot break down the traffic by port (oh, wouldn't that be sweet).
Now, short of turning on the "thorough" setting in QDNS, is there an
"guess-timate" of how much network traffic a DNS server will see over
the course of the day? Is it relational or independent to the number
of domains (primary, secondary, or both) to which it is authoritative?
Any info would be wonderfully helpful in having us track this
craziness. We monitor our servers via an http hit every five
minutes. Our colo boxes are also monitored by the colo facility
every 30 seconds, and a couple of our customers separately monitor
their domains periodically -- all of this shows up in the http logs
-- and accounts for a negligible quantity of traffic. Would it be
beneficial to run thorough logs for 48 hours to gauge activity, or
would I end up with 100 Mb of data I wouldn't be able to analyze
without writing my own analyzer? (Is there a DNS log analyzer for
your product akin to FunnelWeb or Summary?). Obviously, this is a
financial issue for me otherwise I wouldn't be so curious.
Thanks,
paul vail
after hours
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |