Search Again:

Re: name server "discovery" ?

From: Aaron Lynch
Date: Wednesday, June 6, 2001
Time: 11:12:53 am

A) why can't he just enter in your nameservers addresses? It's an easy fix.
B) The only 'discovery' I know is DHCP or BOOTP.

HOWEVER, it would not surprise me in the least if Windows will get that info
from a primary domain controller or from active directory somehow. (frankly
it wouldn't surprise me if microsoft ran a port scan of the whole network,
and sent the result to redmond.)

However, since you are not running a win server for him to specifically get
that info from, it doesn't exist. If he can't resolve names, he should
_try_ adding a nameserver first, then bitch if that doesn't work.


On 6/5/01 6:42 AM, The Defendant "Joseph D'Andrea" <JoeDan@West21.com>
Confessed:

> I have a co-lo client in our facility and his box is running
> windows2000. That's his first problem. ;-) He claims that he doesn't
> have to provide any name servers in his TCP/IP set-up because when
> there are no name servers specified, windows2000 will "discover" the
> "closest" name servers and use them. I know he's full of it because
> he is also convinced that _every_ name server on the entire internet
> gets a "root update" at 5am and 5pm every day.
>
> How does this relate to QDNS... well he's saying that since I'm his
> ISP and since he can't resolve certain DNS names and numbers then my
> name server (QDNS) must be wrong. Is there such a thing as name
> server discovery?
>
> Thanks,
> ___Joe___
>
> _________________________________________________
> Joseph D'Andrea JoeDan@West21.com
> WEST21.com Internet services for the 21st Century
> http://www.west21.com/
> _________________________________________________
>
>

-- Aaron Lynch
System Administrator
NineWire Digital Solutions || http://ninewire.com


<insert Witty Signature Here>




Messages In This Thread:



Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page