Search Again: Re: auto creation of NS records From: andrew Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 Time: 4:45:23 am cool...and yes, I did have my primary listed by IP instead of name. Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Men & Mice Support" <cbuxton@menandmice.com> To: "QuickDNS Talk" <quickdns-talk@lists.menandmice.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:10 AM Subject: Re: auto creation of NS records > In QuickDNS Manager's main window (the one in the upper right), when > you see your servers listed, are they listed by name or by IP address? > > Any server listed by IP address will not have an NS record created > for it automatically. You should manually add any such missing NS > record, using the server's name. The order of your NS records is > irrelevant to their function. > ____________________________________________________________________ > Chris Buxton Men & Mice > cbuxton@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy > > At 8:14 PM -0400 10/9/01, andrew wrote: > >Hi: Forgive the newbie-ness of this post, but to create a new site (3.5.1) I > >usually export an existing site, edit its records, then import it > >under the new > >site name. > > > >Today I tried creating a new site using the "new site" link in the Manager...I > >checked my secondary NS in the "add slave zone" option, and when it opened the > >blank site there was an NS record for the secondary but not for the > >primary NS. > > > >Is this correct? I usually have the primary NS record listed first in the > >domain, but maybe it's redundant to have it? Or do I have to add it > >in manually? > > > >TIA, Andrew > >

Messages In This Thread: auto creation of NS records by andrew on Oct 9, 2001 at 5:15:13 pm Re: auto creation of NS records by Men & Mice Support on Oct 10, 2001 at 1:11:37 am Re: auto creation of NS records by andrew on Oct 10, 2001 at 4:45:23 am