Search Again: Re: BIND 9? From: Men & Mice Support Date: Thursday, January 10, 2002 Time: 3:47:41 am Not recommended. In our tests, it has not worked well at all. the current version of QuickDNS Remote for Linux is designed for BIND 8.2.x. In particular, QuickDNS Remote's preferred method of controlling named is through a command socket (similar to how 'ndc' controls named). BIND 9 doesn't use this type of command socket; it uses a network socket instead of a FIFO socket. There are other significant differences between BIND 8 and BIND 9 as well. ____________________________________________________________________ Chris Buxton Men & Mice support@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy At 11:25 AM +0000 1/10/02, Dave Reddy wrote: >Have QDNS running with BIND 9 on RedHat 7.1. Works with QDNS remote >except for a bug when getting server info (crashes named). > >Is this a safe config to use? > >dave. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mia's Virtual Post Office [mailto:list@mia.net] >Sent: 09 January 2002 06:44 >To: QuickDNS Talk >Subject: BIND 9? > > >Any news on when QDNS will work with the latest version of BIND, or >basically anything in the 9.x range? > >Thanx.. > >jer, > >Bella Mia, Inc. >High Speed Wireless - www.dslone.com >Domain Registration - www.thednsplace.com >Web Hosting and Colocation - www.hostdrive.com >Nation Wide Dialup 4 years and running - www.mia.net > > > > >NetZero = What this company will "NET" --- "ZERO"

Messages In This Thread: BIND 9? by Mia''s Virtual Post Office on Jan 8, 2002 at 10:44:50 pm Re: BIND 9? by Men & Mice Support on Jan 8, 2002 at 10:57:27 pm Re: BIND 9? by Mia''s Virtual Post Office on Jan 8, 2002 at 11:00:12 pm Re: BIND 9? by Dave Reddy on Jan 10, 2002 at 3:27:34 am Re: BIND 9? by Men & Mice Support on Jan 10, 2002 at 3:47:41 am