Search Again: Re: Suggestion for 1.82 From: Trish Kleuskens Date: Thursday, February 4, 1999 Time: 5:04:26 pm fyi, We have the same situation and we of course do not want to include Barter Points as revenue, so we Added Barter Points as a field like Cash, Check and Money Order, etc. Then if you put the Value in the line item where you would normally put the Check #, you can run a report by going into: payments search type and date range Hope this helps!!! trish At 06:37 PM 2/4/99 -0600, OptiGold User wrote: > >Yes, that is what I have been doing, so when we upgrade (every 2 weeks) " a >good thing" we have to do it again, would it be much trouble if you add it >permanently? > > >At 02:50 PM 2/4/99 -0800, you wrote: >>OptiGold User wrote: >> >>>We belong to two Trade Exhanges where we sell our services on trade. It >>>would be nice to have features added directed towards trade/barter. An >>>example would be when adding payments " Cash, Checks, Money Orders etc." >>>can you add Trade to the Type List? >>> >>>Maybe some tracking features..etc... >> >>On the drop-down list that you select the payment type from, go to the >>last option... "Edit..." and you can edit the drop-down list. >> >>One thing to note though is that changes to that particular value list >>will be lost if you upgrade. So you will have to change it again if you >>upgrade since it's not a dynamic value list. >> >> - Shawn >> >>------------------------------- >>Shawn D. Hogan >>President, Data Point Solutions >>http://www.data-point.com >>(619) 452-3696 >>ICQ: 8319647 >> >Thank You, >Mark V. Busnelli, Sr. >General Manager >ANewVision InterNet Services > >Come Visit us at: http://www.ANewVision.com > >1300 East Glendale Avenue >Appleton, WI 54911-2131 >920-993-1533 > > Operations Manager Simply Internet 8963 Complex Drive Suite F San Diego, CA 92123 619-565-SURF x111

Messages In This Thread: Suggestion for 1.82 by Mark V. Busnelli on Feb 4, 1999 at 2:47:21 pm Re: Suggestion for 1.82 by Shawn Hogan on Feb 4, 1999 at 2:55:59 pm Re: Suggestion for 1.82 by Mark V. Busnelli on Feb 4, 1999 at 4:43:13 pm Re: Suggestion for 1.82 by Trish Kleuskens on Feb 4, 1999 at 5:04:26 pm Re: Suggestion for 1.82 by Shawn Hogan on Feb 4, 1999 at 5:04:50 pm Re: Suggestion for 1.82 by Alexi Touloumis on Feb 4, 1999 at 5:11:23 pm Re: Suggestion for 1.82 by Mark V. Busnelli on Feb 4, 1999 at 7:53:26 pm Re: Suggestion for 1.82 by Mark V. Busnelli on Feb 4, 1999 at 7:53:34 pm