|
|
 |  |
Re: Auto-server script QFrom: Melissa Starnes Date: Tuesday, February 9, 1999
Time: 1:28:54 pmWhy don't you just create that person another 'independent' account. That
is what we do when we have this problem and in the customer notes at the
bottom just note that they have 2 accounts and that way they are tied
together but you manage them separately. Also I already mentioned this to
Shawn in private email but maybe he can come up with a way to 'group'
accounts together but not on the 'slave' basis that optigold does now.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isp-list@data-point.com [mailto:isp-list@data-point.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 06, 1999 7:40 PM
> To: Missy
> Subject: Re: [Optigold-ISP] Auto-server script Q
>
>
>
> > If someone *really* wants it to work on a per servic basis...
> then fine,
> > pay the development costs and I'll make you your very own
> custom version
> > that does do it like that. But it will never, ever, ever, ever be part
> > of the primary build version.
>
> How much?
>
> > Me being this insistent on this issue should probably tell you guys
> > something... :-)
>
> I think it's very impressive - the amount of features added and stabiltiy.
> But with all due respect, this is a major flaw (probably the major flaw)
> in the software, as it stands now.
>
> Just come up with an elegant work-around; I don't mind paying an extra
> "user license" per extra plan per user.
>
> A suggestion -
>
> Being able to easily group multiple people accounts, under one username,
> with each "virtual user" having a separate exp. date, and have account
> turnon/shutoff optionally call the server with the plan/"billing cycle".
>
> The fact that I keep asking about this issue should probably tell you
> something :)
>
> Really, you can't ask people to modify their billing practices just to
> use your software. When you come up with a work-around, I will be able
> to recommend Optigold with no major reservations.
>
> > - Shawn
>
> Avi
>
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |