Search Again: Re: Headless (non)operation on OSX From: David Hooper Date: Monday, April 29, 2002 Time: 7:51:51 am Len, I was hoping that someone, might have managed to set up an OSX without a monitor. However, since your reply is a question, it does not seem like you have. It is a question I do not understand either, care to elaborate? > Will an "active" KVM switch emulate a SVGA, I think, fooling the main unit > into thinking there is a monitor attached? Apple seem to think there is no fooling it. > The other alternative is to run FreeBSD-only, runs fine headless. :)) That is not helpful (or funny) under present circumstances. > but co-lo use of Mac's is probably seen as too small a market for Apple to > pursue, esp when something like headless would violate their religion. Co-lo macs used to work fine. But this is not just a co-lo issue. Not every office network has a monitor on its file server. As makers of serving software for Mac with remote administration, shouldn't Men & Mice take a lively interest in this and try and help (Apple/Me) find an answer? Hope so. David

Messages In This Thread: Headless (non)operation on OSX by David Hooper on Apr 29, 2002 at 5:11:21 am Re: Headless (non)operation on OSX by Len Conrad on Apr 29, 2002 at 6:35:55 am Re: Headless (non)operation on OSX by David Hooper on Apr 29, 2002 at 7:51:51 am Re: Headless (non)operation on OSX by dan@wavefront.ca (Dan Tappin) on Apr 29, 2002 at 7:59:35 am Re: Headless (non)operation on OSX by Alan McCarty on Apr 29, 2002 at 9:49:13 am Re: Headless (non)operation on OSX by Global Homes Webmaster on Apr 29, 2002 at 9:57:08 am Re: Headless (non)operation on OSX by Warren Michelsen on Apr 29, 2002 at 8:17:32 pm