Search Again:

Re: No authority records

From: qdns
Date: Thursday, October 10, 2002
Time: 2:01:08 pm


Am Donnerstag, 10.10.02 um 01:51 Uhr schrieb Men & Mice Support:

> In the first case, you asked your server for a record that doesn't
> exist, for a domain name that does exist (mountain.ch). In other
> words, there is such a domain name, but it doesn't have a TXT record.
> QuickDNS Server responded with 0 records in all three sections,
> indicating that it knows authoritatively that there is no such record.
> This is a correct and valid response. However, since it contains no
> records, it is not cacheable.
>
> In the second case, you asked your server for information it didn't
> have. So it asked one of our servers, in this case our ISP's
> (BIND-based) server, and then returned that response. Once again, you
> asked for a domain name that exists, but a record type that does not
> exist. The server gave back a cacheable negative response, which is (I
> believe) actually invalid - this response (as I recall) indicates that
> there are no records of any kind named "menandmice.com"

I can ask every dns-server, and it will not give me the SOA record for
the zone of mountain.ch.. But the dns-server will give back, all SOA
records on all other zones witch I tried.
Why?
Gruss Oliver


> In situations where the query is for a domain name that doesn't exist,
> an authoritative server may (optionally) return the SOA record for the
> zone that would have contained this name in the authority section of
> the response. This result is cacheable, and this is called "negative
> caching". BIND 8 implements this behavior of returning negative
> results.




Messages In This Thread:



Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page