Search Again: Re: Surcharge for Paper Invoice? From: Shawn Hogan Date: Monday, December 16, 2002 Time: 10:46:46 pm ISP List wrote: > Could you just add another Invoice type/class, say, "Paper2", and have that > type be the "Override" that would *not* get billed the extra $1? That way, > you shouldn't need to add an additional override structure.. Good idea, but then you make the existing drop-down twice as big... It would go from: [Paper/Email/None/Both] to: [Paper/Email/None/Free Paper/Email & Paper/Email & Free Paper/None] A bit confusing and annoying I think. An extra override would be better in that case I think. Another problem with that is there are *so* many places within Optigold that reference [Email/Paper/Both/None] that it would take me days to find them all and change them all. So that's another reason that the "No Charge For Paper Invoice" override would be better. That way you are keeping the new override specific to just the new invoicing function and not needing to change all the existing code. - Shawn ---------------------------------- Shawn D. Hogan President, Digital Point Solutions http://www.digitalpoint.com (858) 452-3696 --------------------------------------------------- To subscribe, unsubscribe or to search list archive please visit http://www.optigold.com/lists/isp.html ---------------------------------------------------

Messages In This Thread: Surcharge for Paper Invoice? by Mike Bacher on Dec 16, 2002 at 7:03:38 am Re: Surcharge for Paper Invoice? by Jory Privett on Dec 16, 2002 at 9:37:05 pm Re: Surcharge for Paper Invoice? by Shawn Hogan on Dec 16, 2002 at 10:37:03 pm Re: Surcharge for Paper Invoice? by Mike Bacher on Dec 16, 2002 at 10:42:02 pm Re: Surcharge for Paper Invoice? by Shawn Hogan on Dec 16, 2002 at 10:46:46 pm