|
|
 |  |
Re: FileMaker Dependent, aarrrghFrom: Shawn Hogan Date: Tuesday, December 31, 2002
Time: 7:24:50 pmRobert Canary wrote:
> Your kidding me, is that why I am knocking on Optigold's door, looking
> for a better solution as I well indicated in the original post. Come
> on Michael, if we didn't already know what you just spewed out, then
> this mailing list would be empty. Please don't get hung up on the SQL,
> okay. I need to find a solution for this $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Filemaker
> issue.
As I mentioned, it's $215 through us.
> As I said I cannot setup and run through all the moving parts in 15
> days. I know there has to be solution that I am not seeing for getting
> a longer time set these things up. Optigold obviously isn't the
> problem, but I know others who have setup Optigold has come accross the
> same "Sticker Shock" on the FIleMaker. The price tag of Filemaker is
> yet another draw back aginst Optigold. The overall price tag is getting
> heavier......even on the free version of Optigold.
As far as testing Optigold, FileMaker Server adds absolutely *nothing* to
Optigold funtionality-wise. So if you want to test if it actually works in
a multi-user environment, then you could do it with FileMaker Server, but
for setting up/configuring Optigold, you don't need FileMaker Server and if
you want to move your local copy of Optigold to FileMaker Server later, you
can simply copy the files to it.
- Shawn
----------------------------------
Shawn D. Hogan
President, Digital Point Solutions
http://www.digitalpoint.com
(858) 452-3696
---------------------------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe or to search list archive
please visit http://www.optigold.com/lists/isp.html
---------------------------------------------------
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |