 |  |
Neither of the master accounts that these slaves are under have term. dates
Re: Slave accounts
From: Shannon Owen
Date: Tuesday, April 6, 1999
Time: 9:33:58 pm
in them, but both master accounts that the problem slave accounts are under
were imported. Here's my thought, delete the master accounts (since they
were imported), re-create them in Optigold, put the slave accounts back
under them, rebuild the indexes and see if that fixes the problem?
Thanks,
Shannon
Shannon Owen
First Step Internet
sowen@fsr.com
(208)882-8869/(888)676-6377 ext. 34
At 08:49 PM 4/6/99 -0700, you wrote:
>Shannon Owen wrote:
>
>>I'm using the standard "Slave" account type, any other ideas?
>
>Yep... Okay... I went ahead and picked through it, and yes... if there is
>an invalid date specified (which is the question mark) as the termination
>date, then it would ask like you were describing.
>
>Now... moving a little farther backwards...
>
>A slave account's termination date is based on the master account. So
>the slave account's termination date is set to whatever its master
>account termination date is when the indexes are rebuilt.
>
>Okay... so now that we know that {grin}, check the master account's
>termination date.
>
>Is it possible that the master (or slave) account was an account that was
>imported? And if so, it sounds like the import file (or order) was
>incorrect, in that it mapped the termination date something that wasn't a
>valid date.
>
> - Shawn
>
>-------------------------------
>Shawn D. Hogan
>President, Digital Point Solutions
>http://www.digitalpoint.com
>(619) 452-3696
>ICQ: 8319647
>
>
>-------------------------------------------
>To subscribe, unsubscribe and list archive
>please visit http://www.optigold.com/lists
>-------------------------------------------
>
>
-------------------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe and list archive
please visit http://www.optigold.com/lists
-------------------------------------------
Messages In This Thread:
Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page