|
|
 |  |
Re: Clarification - Multiple Company LicenseFrom: Tom ONeil Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2003
Time: 6:03:22 pmShawn Hogan wrote:
> Tom ONeil wrote:
>>Here's a snippet of a conversation from last month...
>>
>>"We didn't suspend the non-paying users or get the invoices out because
>>the office line went down."
>>
>>"We have 20 racks of equipment in the colo, 3 bandwidth providers on 3
>>networks, access to 9 carriers, 2 dedicated machines running $3K in
>>licenses with over 500 man-hours in configuration and it doesn't work
>>because of a cable modem? And in order to make it work there we need
>>another filemaker license running on a Windows box?"
>>
>>"Well, yes."
>
>
> Well, where you want to put your billing system is of course up to you, but
> for me personally, I wouldn't feel comfortable putting my customer data on a
> remote co-located server somewhere with no firewall protection.
>
> - Shawn
I wouldn't either and I resent the inference that we have.
Nor will I run it without a building UPS, 7X24 monitoring, onsite
security and a fire supression system.
That running a customer information database on a DSL line without a
firewall, even behind NAT, in a standard office environment is somehow
secure is ludicrous at best.
Perpetuate what you will about billing software, but do not presume to
speak about network security.
--
Tom ONeil
Superhero Networks
http://www.superheronet.net
The colocation and systems professionals
---------------------------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe or to search list archive
please visit http://www.optigold.com/lists/isp.html
---------------------------------------------------
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |