Search Again: Re: Qdns under classic From: Men & Mice Support Date: Monday, March 3, 2003 Time: 1:57:24 pm At 10:04 PM +0100 3/3/03, f.frassy wrote: >On 3/03/03 20:48, "mattb" <mattb@iarc.uaf.edu> wrote: > >> I don't have an answer for you, but do have a question, what DNS are >> you running under classic? Or is the DNS on a different machine? > >Thanks, I would like to have qdns 2.2.1 working on a G4 with mac os X. I >would love to suppose it will not be worse than on my 6100... Who was a >thingh I never add to bother for years... Excuse my english here. We've heard rumors that this can be done, but we don't support it. Classic's networking support seems insufficiently robust to support services reliably. > > Reason I ask is because of some known vulnerabilities in early >> versions of BIND and the newer BINDs require 3.x and later of QDNS. >> (or should I say the other way around...) > >Am I oblige to use bind with mac os X even if I use classic ? I feel pretty >newbee at the moment. Ok, I am going here : >Upgrade 2.x -> 4.0 single-user for Mac OS X >;-) > A last question : could I use 1 licence for primary and secondary as it was >the case since second version ? No. Contact our sales department to find out what it will cost you to go from one 2-server license for QuickDNS Pro 2.x to two 1-server licenses for QuickDNS 4.5. (Version 4.5 was released a couple of days ago, except for QuickDNS Manager for Mac OS X, which will be released in a couple of days.) ____________________________________________________________________ Chris Buxton Men & Mice support@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy

Messages In This Thread: Qdns under classic by f.frassy on Mar 3, 2003 at 7:34:02 am Re: Qdns under classic by mattb on Mar 3, 2003 at 11:49:18 am Re: Qdns under classic by f.frassy on Mar 3, 2003 at 1:03:35 pm Re: Qdns under classic by Men & Mice Support on Mar 3, 2003 at 1:57:24 pm Re: Qdns under classic by mattb on Mar 3, 2003 at 2:13:01 pm Re: Qdns under classic by Mia''s Virtual Post Office on Mar 3, 2003 at 2:24:04 pm