QuickDNS Manager 3.5

Re: QuickDNS Manager 3.5

From:

Date:

Time:

I should have said that I need this for Windows.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Men & Mice Support" <cbuxton@menandmice.com>
To: "QuickDNS Talk" <quickdns-talk@lists.menandmice.com>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 4:17 PM
Subject: QuickDNS Manager 3.5 (was: Re: Upgrade from 4.0 to 4.5)

> <ftp://ftp.menandmice.com/pub/quickdns/macmanagercarbon35.sit.hqx>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Chris Buxton Men & Mice
> support@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy
>
> At 1:56 PM -0500 5/23/03, TechCare wrote:
> >Where can I find a download for QDNS Manager for version 3.5.3.
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Mac McClellan" <mmcclell@nuskin.com>
> >To: <quickdns-talk@lists.menandmice.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 6:45 PM
> >Subject: Re: Upgrade from 4.0 to 4.5
> >
> >
> >> Yeah. I already have several servers that were installed initially
with
> >> version 4.5 same OS (RH 7.3) and same hardware. I have two servers
that
> >> were initially installed with 4.0 and want to upgrade them. (Just the
> >> qdnsr part).
> >>
> >> I figure I tar up the directory and if something goes south I just
> >> untar and named still runs even if qdnsr whigs out.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> >>> cbuxton@menandmice.com 05/21 5:35 PM >>>
> >> The issue is libraries. Each distribution has a slightly different
> >> set of basic libraries, and they change between versions. Libraries
> >> are not always backwards-compatible, either.
> >>
> >> The cause of all this is, Linux grew as a project of programmers, by
> >> programmers, for programmers. So the expectation is, if it doesn't
> >> work, you just get the source code and recompile it. For proprietary
> >> software, that doesn't work so well. So we end up having to test
> >> against every conceivable combination of Linux distribution (each
> >> released version) + BIND version.
> >>
> >> This is why we only support two distributions, and only on x86. It
> >> takes considerable effort to test each release against all these
> >> combinations.
> >> ____________________________________________________________________
> >> Chris Buxton Men & Mice
> >> support@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy
> >>
> >> At 3:18 PM -0800 5/21/03, mattb wrote:
> >> >I'm curious. Isn't it just the version of BIND that it should be
> >> >concerned with?
> >> >
> >> >Maybe xinetd?
> >> >
> >> >or does it rely on some other components as well? Kernal version?
> >> >
> >> >Properly written, it would seem like the version of BIND would be
> >> >the only consideration. I'm not a real good programmer, so maybe
> >> >I'm not thinking of all the reasons.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >At 03:05 PM 5/21/2003, you wrote:
> >> >>That's supported. The downloads page says, "Red Hat Linux 7.0 -
> >> 8.0".
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Sales:
888/4-DPOINT

Support:
858/452-3696