|
|
 |  |
Re: QuickDNS Manager 3.5From: Men & Mice Support Date: Saturday, May 24, 2003
Time: 7:23:15 amSorry, I should have given you both URL's.
<ftp://ftp.menandmice.com/pub/quickdns/archive/3.5/WinManager.exe>
____________________________________________________________________
Chris Buxton Men & Mice
support@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy
At 1:30 AM -0500 5/24/03, TechCare wrote:
>I should have said that I need this for Windows.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Men & Mice Support" <cbuxton@menandmice.com>
>To: "QuickDNS Talk" <quickdns-talk@lists.menandmice.com>
>Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 4:17 PM
>Subject: QuickDNS Manager 3.5 (was: Re: Upgrade from 4.0 to 4.5)
>
>
>> <ftp://ftp.menandmice.com/pub/quickdns/macmanagercarbon35.sit.hqx>
>> ____________________________________________________________________
>> Chris Buxton Men & Mice
>> support@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy
>>
>> At 1:56 PM -0500 5/23/03, TechCare wrote:
>> >Where can I find a download for QDNS Manager for version 3.5.3.
>> >
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Mac McClellan" <mmcclell@nuskin.com>
>> >To: <quickdns-talk@lists.menandmice.com>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 6:45 PM
>> >Subject: Re: Upgrade from 4.0 to 4.5
>> >
>> >
>> >> Yeah. I already have several servers that were installed initially
>with
>> >> version 4.5 same OS (RH 7.3) and same hardware. I have two servers
>that
>> >> were initially installed with 4.0 and want to upgrade them. (Just the
>> >> qdnsr part).
>> >>
>> >> I figure I tar up the directory and if something goes south I just
>> >> untar and named still runs even if qdnsr whigs out.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts?
>> >>
>> >> >>> cbuxton@menandmice.com 05/21 5:35 PM >>>
>> >> The issue is libraries. Each distribution has a slightly different
>> >> set of basic libraries, and they change between versions. Libraries
>> >> are not always backwards-compatible, either.
>> >>
>> >> The cause of all this is, Linux grew as a project of programmers, by
>> >> programmers, for programmers. So the expectation is, if it doesn't
>> >> work, you just get the source code and recompile it. For proprietary
>> >> software, that doesn't work so well. So we end up having to test
>> >> against every conceivable combination of Linux distribution (each
>> >> released version) + BIND version.
>> >>
>> >> This is why we only support two distributions, and only on x86. It
>> >> takes considerable effort to test each release against all these
>> >> combinations.
>> >> ____________________________________________________________________
>> >> Chris Buxton Men & Mice
>> >> support@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy
>> >>
>> >> At 3:18 PM -0800 5/21/03, mattb wrote:
>> >> >I'm curious. Isn't it just the version of BIND that it should be
>> >> >concerned with?
>> >> >
>> >> >Maybe xinetd?
>> >> >
>> >> >or does it rely on some other components as well? Kernal version?
>> >> >
>> >> >Properly written, it would seem like the version of BIND would be
>> >> >the only consideration. I'm not a real good programmer, so maybe
>> >> >I'm not thinking of all the reasons.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >At 03:05 PM 5/21/2003, you wrote:
>> >> >>That's supported. The downloads page says, "Red Hat Linux 7.0 -
>> >> 8.0".
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |