|
|
 |  |
Re: load balancing on os 9From: Guy Jones Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2003
Time: 2:00:52 pm3.5.3
What is strange is that I tested it on another zone and it has no
problems on the slave. How can I fix the first zone?
at 10:49 PM +0200 on 6/4/03, Men & Mice Support wrote:
>This is somewhat normal. Do not edit slave zones.
>
>On a slave server, a load balance record will show up as one or more
>NS records. This is perfectly normal.
>
>It sounds like your slave server isn't configured for the load
>balance record. What version of QuickDNS are you using?
>____________________________________________________________________
>Chris Buxton Men & Mice
>support@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy
>
>At 10:32 PM +0200 6/4/03, Guy Jones wrote:
>>I have set up load balancing and it works great on the primary
>>server. But on the slave it has created two new ns records listing
>>the load balance records and when you quiry it the server responds
>>there are no A records. If I open the load balance record and try
>>to save it it says there is a conflict with other records with the
>>same zone name. If I remove the ns records then the message goes
>>away but as soon as the server does an update it reloads the band
>>records. I have tried deleting the zone but it does not help.
>>--
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Guy Jones
>>_____________________________________________
>>The Nova Group
>>http://www.novaint.com
>>mailto:guy.jones@novaint.com
--
Regards,
Guy Jones
_____________________________________________
The Nova Group
http://www.novaint.com
mailto:guy.jones@novaint.com
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |