Search Again: Re: load balancing on os 9 From: Guy Jones Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2003 Time: 3:05:40 pm In the load balanced window there is only the slave server listed. In the host address list I have used the ip addresses of the machines that will be load balanced. Both the master and the slave are open in the manager. at 11:52 PM +0200 on 6/4/03, Men & Mice Support wrote: >Step 1: Make sure you're connected to both servers, simultaneously, >in QuickDNS Manager. Make sure you're connected using hostnames, not >IP addresses - that is, in the Manager window, you see your servers >represented by hostnames and not IP addresses. > >Step 2: Open the zone from the master server. Open the load balance record. > >Step 3: Check the name servers listed at the bottom. Make sure both >of your servers are checked, and that there are no other name server >entries (IP addresses, etc.). If there are other entries, especially >if those entries are IP addresses, you're going to have a tough time >correcting it - it may be faster to simply delete and recreate the >load balance record. >____________________________________________________________________ >Chris Buxton Men & Mice >support@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy > >At 10:58 PM +0200 6/4/03, Guy Jones wrote: >>3.5.3 >> >>What is strange is that I tested it on another zone and it has no >>problems on the slave. How can I fix the first zone? >> >> >>at 10:49 PM +0200 on 6/4/03, Men & Mice Support wrote: >>>This is somewhat normal. Do not edit slave zones. >>> >>>On a slave server, a load balance record will show up as one or >>>more NS records. This is perfectly normal. >>> >>>It sounds like your slave server isn't configured for the load >>>balance record. What version of QuickDNS are you using? >>>____________________________________________________________________ >>>Chris Buxton Men & Mice >>>support@menandmice.com Making DNS Easy >>> >>>At 10:32 PM +0200 6/4/03, Guy Jones wrote: >>>>I have set up load balancing and it works great on the primary >>>>server. But on the slave it has created two new ns records >>>>listing the load balance records and when you quiry it the server >>>>responds there are no A records. If I open the load balance >>>>record and try to save it it says there is a conflict with other >>>>records with the same zone name. If I remove the ns records then >>>>the message goes away but as soon as the server does an update it >>>>reloads the band records. I have tried deleting the zone but it >>>>does not help. >>>>-- >>>> >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>>Guy Jones >>>>_____________________________________________ >>>>The Nova Group >>>>http://www.novaint.com >>>>mailto:guy.jones@novaint.com >> >> >>-- >> >> >>Regards, >>Guy Jones >>_____________________________________________ >>The Nova Group >>http://www.novaint.com >>mailto:guy.jones@novaint.com -- Regards, Guy Jones _____________________________________________ The Nova Group http://www.novaint.com mailto:guy.jones@novaint.com

Messages In This Thread: load balancing on os 9 by Guy Jones on Jun 4, 2003 at 1:46:21 pm Re: load balancing on os 9 by Men & Mice Support on Jun 4, 2003 at 1:50:05 pm Re: load balancing on os 9 by Guy Jones on Jun 4, 2003 at 2:00:52 pm Re: load balancing on os 9 by Men & Mice Support on Jun 4, 2003 at 2:55:10 pm Re: load balancing on os 9 by Guy Jones on Jun 4, 2003 at 3:05:40 pm Re: load balancing on os 9 by Guy Jones on Jun 5, 2003 at 12:51:55 am Re: load balancing on os 9 by Men & Mice Support on Jun 6, 2003 at 12:55:13 am Re: load balancing on os 9 by Guy Jones on Jun 6, 2003 at 2:52:45 am Re: load balancing on os 9 by Guy Jones on Jun 6, 2003 at 4:49:14 am Re: load balancing on os 9 by Men & Mice Support on Jun 6, 2003 at 9:59:58 am Re: load balancing on os 9 by Men & Mice Support on Jun 6, 2003 at 10:02:43 am Re: load balancing on os 9 by Guy Jones on Jun 9, 2003 at 4:09:52 am Re: load balancing on os 9 by Men & Mice Support on Jun 9, 2003 at 12:30:38 pm Re: load balancing on os 9 by Guy Jones on Jun 9, 2003 at 3:06:47 pm Re: load balancing on os 9 by Men & Mice Support on Jun 9, 2003 at 3:26:30 pm