Search Again: Re: Slave vs Caching From: Len Conrad Date: Thursday, July 31, 2003 Time: 11:39:50 am >I know what the differences are hmmmm... >, but my question is why would you want a caching server instead of a >slave server and vis-versa? The caching function has nothing to do with a authoritative server. Two different functions. >Seems like a slave does basically the same thing AND provides a backup for >the main server. a slave doesn't have to be a caching NS, caching NS doesn't have to a slave. one machine can either and/or both. A slave is per zone, not per server. A caching (recursive) NS is per server. Len

Messages In This Thread: Slave vs Caching by mattb on Jul 31, 2003 at 11:25:01 am Re: Slave vs Caching by Len Conrad on Jul 31, 2003 at 11:39:50 am