|
|
 |  |
Re: Working around Verisign power-grab?From: Men & Mice Support Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2003
Time: 6:29:19 pmInstalling a patched version of Bind shouldn't, in theory, affect
QuickDNS at all.
____________________________________________________________________
Chris Buxton Men & Mice
Customer Support Specialist Making DNS Easy
At 9:16 PM -0400 9/16/03, Stonewall Ballard wrote:
>Solving the problem at the routing level doesn't help. My mail server
>(CommuniGate Pro) likes to distinguish real domains from nonexistent ones,
>so that it can reject spam with bad reply addresses.
>
>It would be great if you could say whether patching BIND to recognize the
>Verisign response and converting it back to a "no domain" response would in
>any way affect QuickDNS.
>
>Thanks.
>
> - Stoney
>
>On 9/16/03 8:12 PM, "Men & Mice Support" <cbuxton@menandmice.com> wrote:
>
>> We are not going to endorse any such patch, since we have no control
>> over them and since we're not about to write one of our own.
>>
>> If Verisign's action bothers you, solve the problem at the routing
>> level, as Jer suggests. It won't affect users outside your network,
>> but it's the only reasonably safe solution.
>>
>> Personally, I think some sort of URL spell-checker is a good idea.
>> What they have at the moment seems like a good start.
>> ____________________________________________________________________
>> Chris Buxton Men & Mice
>> Customer Support Specialist Making DNS Easy
>>
>> At 1:45 PM -0400 9/16/03, Stonewall Ballard wrote:
>>> Is there a M&M-approved way to work around the new Verisign wildcard? There
>>> are BIND patches appearing, but I'd like to have some verification from M&M
>>> that this wouldn't mess up QDNS.
>>>
>>> I'm running QDNS on Mac OS X Server 10.2.6.
>>>
>>> - Stoney
>>>
>>> --
>>> Stonewall Ballard Stonetics, Inc.
>>> sb@stonetics.com http://www.stonetics.com/
>>
>>
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |