Search Again: Re: Web Layout From: Shawn Hogan Date: Sunday, May 9, 1999 Time: 9:53:13 pm iServe Internet, Inc. wrote: >We are not running FM Pro server, but in FM Pro 4.0 v2, our cache is set >to 512K. Actually, when we upgraded FM Pro 4 to 4.0 v2, it opens 10 >times faster than the older version. Maybe that has something to do >with it. > >Not sure though, ask Shawn, the OG and NT guru :) I'm not an NT guru (nor do I have aspirations to be one). Hehehe... I'm smart, but I'm not a damn rocket scientist. hehe Uhm... I would say yeah... upgrade to 4.0v2 if you are running 4.0v1 (it's a free upgrade from FileMaker, Inc.) You might want to try (just as a test) to see what happens if you run the web interface on machine that isn't the same as the one running FMServer. Although, since it's a dual processor machine, I would think that NTs threading would make it okay. But who knows. I've seen a few instances of both the web interface and the server running on the same machine... The web interface snags the majority of the CPU resources so that it can process the request quickly. In doing so, it of course left very little resources for FMServer. But it needs to communicate with FMServer in order to get the data to serve. It doesn't get it in a timely manner so it hogs MORE CPU resources to try to get it faster, etc. Basically what it did was choke itself off from FMServer, and in doing so made the web interface slow. Personally, I'll just be much happier when FileMaker Pro 5.0 Server comes out. It will come in NT, Macintosh or UNIX (some flavors at least) and have the web server built into the database server so you won't need a separate client acting as the web server. - Shawn ------------------------------- Shawn D. Hogan President, Digital Point Solutions http://www.digitalpoint.com (619) 452-3696 ------------------------------------------- To subscribe, unsubscribe and list archive please visit http://www.optigold.com/lists -------------------------------------------

Messages In This Thread: Web Layout by iServe Internet, Inc. on May 9, 1999 at 12:36:34 am Re: Web Layout by Shawn Hogan on May 9, 1999 at 12:46:41 am Re: Web Layout by John Driscoll on May 9, 1999 at 8:14:54 am Re: Web Layout by iServe Internet, Inc. on May 9, 1999 at 6:52:43 pm Re: Web Layout by iServe Internet, Inc. on May 9, 1999 at 6:53:07 pm Re: Web Layout by Alexi Touloumis on May 9, 1999 at 7:22:46 pm Re: Web Layout by Shawn Hogan on May 9, 1999 at 7:25:21 pm Re: Web Layout by John Driscoll on May 9, 1999 at 9:11:19 pm Re: Web Layout by iServe Internet, Inc. on May 9, 1999 at 9:42:44 pm Re: Web Layout by Shawn Hogan on May 9, 1999 at 9:53:13 pm Re: Web Layout by Paul Romero on May 10, 1999 at 12:35:07 am Re: Web Layout by John Driscoll on May 10, 1999 at 3:55:40 am Re: Web Layout by hUnTeR on May 10, 1999 at 4:25:47 am Re: Web Layout by Tom Terpening on May 10, 1999 at 4:25:51 am Re: Web Layout by Paul Romero on May 10, 1999 at 8:47:47 am Re: Web Layout by Alexi Touloumis on May 10, 1999 at 10:55:52 am Re: Web Layout by Shawn Hogan on May 10, 1999 at 10:58:51 am Re: Web Layout by Frank on May 10, 1999 at 11:46:11 am Re: Web Layout by Alexi Touloumis on May 10, 1999 at 6:22:09 pm Re: Web Layout by William H. Williams on May 11, 1999 at 2:28:57 pm Re: Web Layout by Shawn Hogan on May 11, 1999 at 2:44:26 pm Re: Web Layout by Melissa Starnes on May 12, 1999 at 11:37:49 am Re: Web Layout by Shawn Hogan on May 12, 1999 at 11:48:09 am Re: Web Layout by Melissa Starnes on May 12, 1999 at 12:59:16 pm Re: Web Layout by Shawn Hogan on May 12, 1999 at 1:10:34 pm Re: Web Layout by Melissa Starnes on May 12, 1999 at 2:35:30 pm