Search Again: Re: Should be dnsreport.com From: Len Conrad Date: Monday, December 22, 2003 Time: 5:33:46 pm >Understood...but then those people aren't competent to be managing DNS in >the first place if they can't recognize that it's a tool; and not their >sysadmin. Even for the completely not competent to manage their own DNS, >dnsreport can only benfit them. I'm not saying it doesn't, it clearly does help a lot of people, but the "no glue" BS has/does/will confuse these very people. >> get a lot of questions from users of dnsreport.com asking about this >> and other "Warn" messages at that site. >>>>>Anyone care to comment on this? >>>> >>>>I had a big thread with the DNSReport guy about DNS Report sending >>>>people off on wild goose chases into many lists, like the one you're >>>>on, trying to fix or solve the unbroken. His report comments are >>>>simply wrong at worst, and are misleading, confusing logorrhea at best. >>> >>>You said that a few months ago, and you're saying it again now. I asked >>>you for supporting evidence then (which you did not provide). Should I >>>bother asking again? >> >>What evidence do you need? > >I'm happy to see that at least finally the request for evidence has at >least been acknowledged. How about a specific and verifiable >dnsreport-generated zone report with your notations of what items are >"wrong at worst" and "misleading , confusing logorrhea at best"?? I'll >settle for a single such report. The glaring one was "no glue", and when I made no progress with Scott on that biggy, I just didn't waste my time on the rest of it. > conclusion on the EIMS list, then surely neither you nor Len should have no trouble backing up your accusations. I have >How can you possibly be in a position to know this? Short answer is that >neither you nor Len are. It is merely unfounded speculation on your parts. oops, you're very wrong there, see my other post. No speculation on my part. Len

Messages In This Thread: Should be dnsreport.com by Mia''s Virtual Post Office on Dec 22, 2003 at 3:51:05 pm Should be dnsreport.com by Mia''s Virtual Post Office on Dec 22, 2003 at 4:10:21 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Michael Wise on Dec 22, 2003 at 5:14:54 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Len Conrad on Dec 22, 2003 at 5:33:46 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Nicholas Orr on Dec 22, 2003 at 6:23:25 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Len Conrad on Dec 23, 2003 at 4:41:29 am Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Michael Wise on Dec 23, 2003 at 10:00:20 am Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Len Conrad on Dec 23, 2003 at 11:37:18 am Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Thomas Sulentic on Dec 23, 2003 at 12:07:46 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Michael Wise on Dec 23, 2003 at 5:15:33 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Len Conrad on Dec 23, 2003 at 9:06:03 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Men & Mice Support on Dec 26, 2003 at 12:55:46 pm