Search Again: Re: Should be dnsreport.com From: Thomas Sulentic Date: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 Time: 12:07:46 pm couldn't have explained it better myself... ;) i do see your point.. its in how you 'read' what it is saying is where the confusion exists.. thomas sulentic ZooAchtiv > nope, my complaints about "missing glue" BS from DNSReports are not > invalidated by an error in the com.au server. But I don't expect you, > or anybody else here, to appreciate the differences without this > explanation: > > 1. My complaint is: DNSReport WARNs about ALL correctly missing > "missing glue" at any NS that should not, and will never have such > glue, and is "missing" such glue for perfectly valid reasons. > > 2. DNSExpert has detected an ERROR by the .com.au NSs because they are > missing .com.au glue THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE. > > Does everybody here not understand the differences between points 1. > and 2. ?

Messages In This Thread: Should be dnsreport.com by Mia''s Virtual Post Office on Dec 22, 2003 at 3:51:05 pm Should be dnsreport.com by Mia''s Virtual Post Office on Dec 22, 2003 at 4:10:21 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Michael Wise on Dec 22, 2003 at 5:14:54 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Len Conrad on Dec 22, 2003 at 5:33:46 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Nicholas Orr on Dec 22, 2003 at 6:23:25 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Len Conrad on Dec 23, 2003 at 4:41:29 am Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Michael Wise on Dec 23, 2003 at 10:00:20 am Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Len Conrad on Dec 23, 2003 at 11:37:18 am Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Thomas Sulentic on Dec 23, 2003 at 12:07:46 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Michael Wise on Dec 23, 2003 at 5:15:33 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Len Conrad on Dec 23, 2003 at 9:06:03 pm Re: Should be dnsreport.com by Men & Mice Support on Dec 26, 2003 at 12:55:46 pm