Search Again:

Re: Primary/Slave Issue

From: Warren Michelsen
Date: Saturday, April 10, 2004
Time: 10:13:18 am

At 2:15 PM -0800 3/25/04, Men & Mice Support wrote:
>Sorry for the long delay.
>
>Having one server as master (primary) and one as slave is the normal way things work. It doesn't sound like you have a problem in your configuration.

In the past, all my zones were in the Primary data folder on both servers and when I updated via QDNS, it updated both at once, since I was connected to both when the changes were made.

If I'm going to go the master/slave route, there's not much point in connecting to both with QDNS manager.

In any case, I copied the primary data file to the second server (deleting the secondary entry for that zone) and now things appear to be working as they used to.

>____________________________________________________________________
>Chris Buxton Men & Mice
>Customer Support Specialist Making DNS Easy
>
>At 7:28 AM -0700 3/15/04, Warren Michelsen wrote:
>>QDNS Pro 3.5.3 on OS 9.2, QDNS Manager 3.5.1 on 9 and 10.3.2
>>
>>I have two QDNS servers. The more recent zones I've added have been added with one of my servers as primary but the second was added as a slave zone on one server or another. I was connected to both servers at the time. Why did it come out this way? How do I correct this?
>>
>>If I delete the 'slave' version of the zone on my second server and copy to it the primary version of the zone from my first server, will this set things right?




Messages In This Thread:



Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page