|
|
 |  |
Re: Primary/Slave IssueFrom: Warren Michelsen Date: Saturday, April 10, 2004
Time: 10:13:18 amAt 2:15 PM -0800 3/25/04, Men & Mice Support wrote:
>Sorry for the long delay.
>
>Having one server as master (primary) and one as slave is the normal way things work. It doesn't sound like you have a problem in your configuration.
In the past, all my zones were in the Primary data folder on both servers and when I updated via QDNS, it updated both at once, since I was connected to both when the changes were made.
If I'm going to go the master/slave route, there's not much point in connecting to both with QDNS manager.
In any case, I copied the primary data file to the second server (deleting the secondary entry for that zone) and now things appear to be working as they used to.
>____________________________________________________________________
>Chris Buxton Men & Mice
>Customer Support Specialist Making DNS Easy
>
>At 7:28 AM -0700 3/15/04, Warren Michelsen wrote:
>>QDNS Pro 3.5.3 on OS 9.2, QDNS Manager 3.5.1 on 9 and 10.3.2
>>
>>I have two QDNS servers. The more recent zones I've added have been added with one of my servers as primary but the second was added as a slave zone on one server or another. I was connected to both servers at the time. Why did it come out this way? How do I correct this?
>>
>>If I delete the 'slave' version of the zone on my second server and copy to it the primary version of the zone from my first server, will this set things right?
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |