|
|
 |  |
Re: Moving to windowsFrom: JRascon@ameriquest.com Date: Wednesday, August 18, 2004
Time: 9:02:04 amWindows 2000 and Windows 2003 server products are pretty decent. The DNS
and DHCP are well tooled and from my hands on experience capable of
handling heavy demands. Currently we have Win2k DNS and DHCP managing
12000 users and 1500 servers and our performance is fine. My thought on
the issue is you use what you have and Microsoft provides DNS and DHCP
integrated into its product and Active Directory. If you intend on using
Active Directory then you will want to use MS DNS and DHCP. "imho"
Best Regards,
Jacob Rascon
System Engineer
Systems Technology - Infrastructure
Jim Cobb <jim.cobb@tissue1.org>
Sent by: <quickdns-talk@lists.menandmice.com>
08/18/2004 06:05 AM
Please respond to "QuickDNS Talk"
To: QuickDNS Talk <quickdns-talk@lists.menandmice.com>
cc:
Subject: Moving to windows
Management has decided that we are moving 100% to windows. Currently we
are 2/3rds Macs with windows machines under NT domains/WINS and we are
using using OS X dns servers with QuickDNS 4.5.1. My questions are:
-Should we use 2003 DNS or stick with Unix DNS?
-If we user 2003 DNS what is it's relationship with QuickDNS/Bind
version 8/9?
-While there are some instructions in the manual for changing Bind to
dynamic DNS (which we may have to do for the transition), the utilities
mentioned in the docs either don't seem to work or don't exist on the
servers (we are using 10.2.8).
-What are you guys using out there? My Microsoft people predict total
and abject failure unless we use the entire server2003 suite, including
DHCP etc. end to end unadulterated by Unix or "foreign programs" (which
I interpret as non-microsoft).
Thanks for any help with this-
Jim
-----------------------------------------
No electronic signature authorized - See complete company policy statement
at: http://www.ameriquestmortgage.com/terms.html
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |