Search Again: Re: BIND 9.2.4 From: Scott Haneda Date: Thursday, November 4, 2004 Time: 6:50:59 pm on 11/4/04 6:18 PM, Jerry Pasker at info@n-connect.net wrote: > 3) If it's just as simple as replacing named with a new named file > downloaded from menandmice's ftp server, why is there so much talk of > compiling BIND 9.3.0? Some people do not trust downloading binaries and would prefer to know what is going on. Its nice to have the option either way. M&M is a trusted source, but you never can be so sure as to compile on your own. > 4) If it really is just that simple, why isn't there a simple disk > image with an installer that goes and replaces named with the new > named? I am sure there will be with the next release of QDNS, at this time, it is relatively new to even know how to fix this. I am sure M&M want to fully test this before releasing it into the wild. For what it is worth, it is not BIND at fault here, it is a pure nicety that we have the "-4" option. This bug is a BSD bug, and one that Apple or the BSD folks will have to ultimately address. -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Scott Haneda Tel: 415.898.2602 <http://www.newgeo.com> Fax: 313.557.5052 <scott@newgeo.com> Novato, CA U.S.A.

Messages In This Thread: BIND 9.2.4 by Jerry Pasker on Nov 4, 2004 at 6:23:22 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by Scott Haneda on Nov 4, 2004 at 6:50:59 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by Men & Mice Support on Nov 4, 2004 at 7:50:33 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by Jody McAlister on Nov 4, 2004 at 8:01:29 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by John May on Nov 4, 2004 at 8:06:17 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by Men & Mice Support on Nov 4, 2004 at 9:21:17 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by ITG Lists on Nov 5, 2004 at 4:21:24 am Re: BIND 9.2.4 by Men & Mice Support on Nov 5, 2004 at 11:28:49 am