Search Again: Re: BIND 9.2.4 From: Men & Mice Support Date: Thursday, November 4, 2004 Time: 9:21:17 pm At 11:04 PM -0500 11/4/04, John May wrote: >>>3) If it's just as simple as replacing named with a new named file >>>downloaded from menandmice's ftp server, why is there so much talk >>>of compiling BIND 9.3.0? >> >>Because we're not confident that this will solve the problem >>either. We're putting out this information for the benefit of those >>users who want to try it. >> >>If anyone else wants the 9.3.0 version compiled for Mac OS X 10.3, >>contact me off-list. I'm also happy to compile for you with IPv6 >>support disabled, so that (in theory) the -4 option should not be >>necessary. > > >What's the difference between the compiled version you have and >compiling 9.3.0 ourselves? If you have Mac OS X 10.3, probably none at all. If you have Mac OS X 10.2, you'd probably better compile it yourself. Chris Buxton Men & Mice - Making DNS Easy Customer Service and Sales Engineer

Messages In This Thread: BIND 9.2.4 by Jerry Pasker on Nov 4, 2004 at 6:23:22 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by Scott Haneda on Nov 4, 2004 at 6:50:59 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by Men & Mice Support on Nov 4, 2004 at 7:50:33 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by Jody McAlister on Nov 4, 2004 at 8:01:29 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by John May on Nov 4, 2004 at 8:06:17 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by Men & Mice Support on Nov 4, 2004 at 9:21:17 pm Re: BIND 9.2.4 by ITG Lists on Nov 5, 2004 at 4:21:24 am Re: BIND 9.2.4 by Men & Mice Support on Nov 5, 2004 at 11:28:49 am