|
|
 |  |
Re: Reverse DNSFrom: Men & Mice Support Date: Monday, February 21, 2005
Time: 2:47:51 pmAs already discussed in private, for the benefit of the audience...
You can use the also-notify statement inside either your options
statement block (/var/named/conf/options) or inside the zone
statement block for a particular zone
(/var/named/conf/zoneopt/zone.name.opt). The syntax is as follows:
also-notify { ip-addr; [...] };
In other words, between the { and the }, enter one or more IP
addresses, with a ; after each one.
Chris Buxton
Men & Mice - Making DNS Easy
At 12:37 PM -0600 2/21/05, Larry Scott Hastings wrote:
>Here's an update, with a question to follow:
>
>Turns out (once again) my ISP changed the servers used for zone
>transfers to servers different than those used as secondary servers
>(for resolution), and didn't tell anyone. I had restricted zone
>transfers to the secondary servers, so updates never made it to the
>secondary servers for resolution.
>
>I've updated my transfer restriction option on dns.hastings.com to
>"any". I'll lock it down to the new zone transfer servers, once I'm
>sure it's working.
>
>As I write this, the new zone transfer servers haven't picked up on
>changes to my reverse zone. I checked the log available in
>QuickDNS, and it shows that it notified the _secondary_ servers.
>That by itself does me no good, as those aren't the servers my ISP
>is using for zone transfers from the master server.
>
>I assume that eventually (based on TTLs), their servers will notice
>my master server's info has changed, do a zone transfer/update and
>update the info on the secondaries.
>
>In the meantime, is there a way in QuickDNS (4.0) to tell my server
>explicitly which server(s) to notify of a zone change? If not, is
>there a change in a conf file I can make?
>
>On Feb 19, 2005, at 10:12 AM, Men & Mice Support wrote:
>
>>At 1:42 PM -0600 2/18/05, Larry Scott Hastings wrote:
>>>Sorry for the delayed response.
>>>
>>>Thanks, Chris. Lots of helpful info there.
>>>
>>>In regard to restarting the name server: Yes I have restarted the
>>>server, same results.
>>>
>>>Although my server is the primary master server, I've not listed
>>>it in the zone files as one of the name servers. Could that be
>>>causing all or some of these problems (failing reverse lookups,
>>>incorrect SOA info on secondaries, possible corrupted cache)?
>>
>>No. That's a strategy called "hidden master". Perfectly normal.
>>
>>You should ask xspedius.net to fix their configuration so that
>>they're using your server as master instead of having their own
>>copy of the zone.
>>
>>Chris Buxton
>>Men & Mice - Making DNS Easy
>>
>>>On Feb 15, 2005, at 9:03 AM, Men & Mice Support wrote:
>>>
>>>>The difference in 'host' command output is caused by the fact
>>>>that I'm querying from the outside - my machine ends up finding
>>>>the delegation records and returning them as the answer. You're
>>>>querying your own server, which returns the authority records
>>>>from your reverse zone.
>>>>
>>>>Here's the output of a 'dig +trace' command:
>>>>
>>>>$ dig +trace ns 208.253.216.in-addr.arpa
>>>>
>>>>; <<>> DiG 9.3.0 <<>> +trace ns 208.253.216.in-addr.arpa
>>>>;; global options: printcmd
>>>>. 65795 IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>. 65795 IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>>>>;; Received 244 bytes from 217.151.171.21#53(217.151.171.21) in 207 ms
>>>>
>>>>216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS chia.ARIN.NET.
>>>>216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dill.ARIN.NET.
>>>>216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS BASIL.ARIN.NET.
>>>>216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS henna.ARIN.NET.
>>>>216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS indigo.ARIN.NET.
>>>>216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS epazote.ARIN.NET.
>>>>216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS figwort.ARIN.NET.
>>>>;; Received 193 bytes from 128.63.2.53#53(H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) in 802 ms
>>>>
>>>>253.216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns1.xspedius.net.
>>>>253.216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns2.xspedius.net.
>>>>253.216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns3.xspedius.net.
>>>>;; Received 111 bytes from 192.35.51.32#53(dill.ARIN.NET) in 901 ms
>>>>
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN NS dns1.xspedius.net.
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN NS dns2.xspedius.net.
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN NS dns3.xspedius.net.
>>>>;; Received 159 bytes from 207.191.50.10#53(dns1.xspedius.net) in 975 ms
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>After that, I went looking for a more detailed response:
>>>>
>>>>$ dig +norec soa 208.253.216.in-addr.arpa @dns1.xspedius.net
>>>>
>>>>; <<>> DiG 9.3.0 <<>> +norec soa 208.253.216.in-addr.arpa
>>>>@dns1.xspedius.net
>>>>;; global options: printcmd
>>>>;; Got answer:
>>>>;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 2936
>>>>;; flags: qr aa ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3
>>>>
>>>>;; QUESTION SECTION:
>>>>;208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. IN SOA
>>>>
>>>>;; ANSWER SECTION:
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN SOA
>>>>dns1.xspedius.net. domain.xspedius.net. 2005010801 3600 1800
>>>>1209600 3600
>>>>
>>>>;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN NS dns3.xspedius.net.
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN NS dns1.xspedius.net.
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN NS dns2.xspedius.net.
>>>>
>>>>;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
>>>>dns1.xspedius.net. 7200 IN A 207.191.50.10
>>>>dns2.xspedius.net. 7200 IN A 207.191.1.10
>>>>dns3.xspedius.net. 7200 IN A 206.222.97.50
>>>>
>>>>;; Query time: 371 msec
>>>>;; SERVER: 207.191.50.10#53(dns1.xspedius.net)
>>>>;; WHEN: Tue Feb 15 06:52:50 2005
>>>>;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 202
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Notice the SOA record's mname field (the name of the primary
>>>>master server). It doesn't show your server. Also notice that the
>>>>response is marked authoritative (flag aa). This tells me that
>>>>they're not acting as slaves for your copy of the zone - they
>>>>have their own copy of the zone, and they're ignoring your
>>>>version.
>>>>
>>>>Here's the same query, sent to your server:
>>>>
>>>>$ dig +norec soa 208.253.216.in-addr.arpa @dns.hastings.com
>>>>
>>>>; <<>> DiG 9.3.0 <<>> +norec soa 208.253.216.in-addr.arpa @dns.hastings.com
>>>>;; global options: printcmd
>>>>;; Got answer:
>>>>;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 60246
>>>>;; flags: qr aa ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3
>>>>
>>>>;; QUESTION SECTION:
>>>>;208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. IN SOA
>>>>
>>>>;; ANSWER SECTION:
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN SOA dns.hastings.com.
>>>>scott.hastings.com. 2005021413 28800 7200 604800 86400
>>>>
>>>>;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns1.xspedius.net.
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns2.xspedius.net.
>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns3.xspedius.net.
>>>>
>>>>;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
>>>>dns1.xspedius.net. 101458 IN A 207.191.50.10
>>>>dns2.xspedius.net. 100073 IN A 207.191.1.10
>>>>dns3.xspedius.net. 114930 IN A 206.222.97.50
>>>>
>>>>;; Query time: 387 msec
>>>>;; SERVER: 216.253.208.2#53(dns.hastings.com)
>>>>;; WHEN: Tue Feb 15 06:55:46 2005
>>>>;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 217
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Given the fact that a query for a PTR record (to your server)
>>>>gets back an indication that the class B subnet reverse is
>>>>handled by the IANA blackhole servers, I'm guessing either your
>>>>server's cache is corrupted or some intervening agent has
>>>>corrupted cache records; the class B subnet reverse zone is quite
>>>>clearly delegated to xspedius.net (as shown in the trace above).
>>>>
>>>>Have you tried restarting the DNS service on your server?
>>>>
>>>>Chris Buxton
>>>>Men & Mice - Making DNS Easy
>>>>
>>>>At 3:13 PM -0600 2/14/05, Larry Scott Hastings wrote:
>>>>>OK, seems my ISP changed the names of their secondary servers on
>>>>>me. I updated those in my zone file for the reverse domain.
>>>>>
>>>>>I still have basically the same question/problem: A lookup for
>>>>>a PTR record for my mail server fails. I'm having trouble
>>>>>sending some emails as a result.
>>>>>
>>>>>The reverse zone is there. The PTR records are there. Why
>>>>>can't a reverse lookup find them? How do I fix this in QuickDNS?
>>>>>
>>>>>On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:51 PM, admin@gippy.net wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:35:40 -0600
>>>>>> Larry Scott Hastings <lshastings@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>From what I can see, the reverse zone _is_ delegated to us. I
>>>>>>>did the same host lookup as Chris, and I show my server and
>>>>>>>the secondaries. I also called my ISP and confirmed that I am
>>>>>>>primary for the reverse domain for our class C.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> host -t ns 208.253.216.in-addr.arpa
>>>>>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa name server ns2.espire.net.
>>>>>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa name server ns3.espire.net.
>>>>>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa name server dns.hastings.com.
>>>>>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa name server ns1.espire.net.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>$ host -t ns 208.253.216.in-addr.arpa
>>>>>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa name server dns2.xspedius.net.
>>>>>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa name server dns3.xspedius.net.
>>>>>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa name server dns1.xspedius.net.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I just did the same command above from my system:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>host -t ns 208.253.216.in-addr.arpa
>>>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa name server dns3.xspedius.net.
>>>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa name server dns1.xspedius.net.
>>>>>>208.253.216.in-addr.arpa name server dns2.xspedius.net.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Same thing returned as what Chris got.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just as an FYI.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nevin Lyne
>>>>>>Gippy's Internet Solutions
>>>>>>http://www.gippy.net/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>--Scott Hastings lshastings@mac.com
|
Messages In This Thread:- Reverse DNS by Warren Michelsen on Oct 30, 1999 at 5:41:00 pm
- Reverse DNS by Caio James on Jun 29, 2000 at 8:23:23 pm
- Reverse DNS by Paul Didzerekis on May 2, 2001 at 1:53:19 pm
- Reverse DNS by Andrew Schmiechen on Jun 21, 2001 at 1:28:00 pm
- reverse DNS by Paul Didzerekis on Jun 21, 2001 at 3:43:12 pm
- Reverse DNS by Dan Tappin on Dec 4, 2001 at 8:01:31 am
- reverse dns by Steve Nowacki on Jul 29, 2003 at 10:02:19 am
- Reverse DNS by Larry Scott Hastings on Feb 11, 2005 at 1:52:38 pm
|

Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page |