Search Again:

Re: Nitpicking

From: Shawn Hogan
Date: Thursday, June 3, 1999
Time: 1:50:36 pm

Mitch Vincent wrote:

>I have often wondered.. Why not a SQL backend? That would make it available
>to virtually every ISP out there, not just the ones that have money to burn
>on commercial database stuff and running NT :-)

I'm not sure how SQL would make it available to any ISP... But uhm...
okay. :-)

A quick comparison of FileMaker Pro Server vs. SQL Server...

Performance - About the same

Price - FileMaker Pro Server is *MUCH* cheaper ($250-$800 for a 100 user
license)

Ease of Setup - Someone with no technical knowledge could setup FileMaker
Pro in a client/server environment in 10 minutes (I could do it in about
30 seconds).

Ease Of Admin - FileMaker Pro Server is much easier

SQL/ODBC - Both can be turned into an ODBC data source for doing external
queries


For this product, it was pretty clear which platform to use... The only
thing that may be a little more robust would be Oracle, but the cost of
ownsership of Oracle would have made it so we would have sold maybe 1 out
of 100 units we currently sell.

Also, Oracle probably wouldn't show an advantage until you hit about 1-2M
customers, at which point, I figured ISPs probably already have a billing
system in place. :-)

- Shawn

-------------------------------
Shawn D. Hogan
President, Digital Point Solutions
http://www.digitalpoint.com
(619) 452-3696


-------------------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe and list archive
please visit http://www.optigold.com/lists
-------------------------------------------



Messages In This Thread:



Return to Digital Point Solutions' Home Page