I take it back - just being incredibly thick :)
Shouldn't be an issue - just point a few new links at the old page, Google will follow them, take the 301 and associate the new page accordingly....
Emphasis very much on the pray. But if it works you will get the correct 301 header.
http://www.seogeeks.com/articles/pagerank-chart.php Would I rely on that being even close to accurate? Not one bit. Still makes for...
I don't think they need to worry about legal action over rankings, after all they have no contracts with anyone listed in the organics, and cannot...
And if you think about it - how can a page with no backlinks other than from the homepage have higher PR than the homepage? The PR of any page is...
That's exactly what SEO is all about these days, or haven't you heard of 'linkbait' :)
YES Either that or a cock-up of monumental proportions.
If you have a popular blog and post daily then the snapshot date will become apparent when an update is complete - after a certain date new pages...
Yep, but are they blocking the love from these links? OT but could you build PR purely from paid posting?
Well that sort of rules out having a website to rank - all sites require HTML? And without a single backlink your site wont even be indexed by...
That's a toughie... Agree fully with the paid trusted directories, but both reviewme and payperpost are likely to be picked up as only...
http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/12-08-2006/clickthrough-analysis-of-aol-datatgz/ breaks down the AOL data
JS event script attached to each result. When you click it sends a small response home tracking that click. Check the code yourself if you want...
Separate names with a comma.
